Daily Kos

Email: bennettmorrison * yahoo.com (where * = @)

Been in NYC for over 10 years.

Headlines Reveal Whitehouse's Lack of Foresight

Thu Sep 01, 2005 at 07:37:11 PM PDT

As a member of the reality-based community, I was equally appalled about the Bush quote about the levees.  To think that no one foresaw the levees breaking is simply ignorant and uninformed.  But it was clear that the White House was trying to play the know-one-knew card again.

The problem is, that everyone knew.  And the media knows that everyone knew.  And if these Reuter/AP Headlines are any indication, they won't let them off the hook for this disastrous lack of foresight:

Budget cuts delayed New Orleans flood control work

White House Backpedals on Flood Control

Excerpts and links in the extended.

Riding the Subway with Howard Dean; Or, What I did this afternoon

Sun Jan 30, 2005 at 04:11:11 PM PDT

I was fifteen minutes late getting to the Afternoon with Howard Dean at the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) 1199, but it was great.   Dean's speech was pretty standard, and I doubt the content would  surprise anyone here.

No, I'm not posting with any new news or ideas that will have any bearing with anything.  I'm just posting a new diary because I got to go into the subway with Howard Dean afterward.  And, well, that was all sorts of weird-crazy-exciting.

(Details follow.)

Poll

What would you do if Howard Dean was behind you going into subway?

18%16 votes
8%7 votes
5%5 votes
10%9 votes
13%12 votes
27%24 votes
15%13 votes

| 86 votes | Vote | Results

Trippi Op-Ed in the WSJ: Yes. Yes. Yes!

Tue Nov 30, 2004 at 08:01:07 AM PDT

As I'm reading Joe Trippi's Op-Ed in today's WSJ, I'm amazed at how much of it has already been discussed on this site.  Read, and you will probably find yourself saying "hell yeah!" over and over again.


The Grassroots Can Save Democrats
Howard Dean paved the way to future victories.

BY JOE TRIPPI
Tuesday, November 30, 2004 12:01 a.m. EST

The staggering defeat of the Democratic Party and its ever-accelerating death spiral weren't obvious from the election results. Two factors masked the extent of the party's trouble. Without the innovation of Internet-driven small-donor fund-raising and a corresponding surge in support from the youngest voters, John Kerry would have suffered a dramatically larger defeat. And the true magnitude of the Democrats' abject failure at the polls in 2004 would have been more clearly revealed.

Continued below.

Whatever happened to "justice"? A framing/values question.

Sun Nov 07, 2004 at 05:59:00 PM PDT

I've only posted a few diaries of the look-at-this-article type, but that small Lakoff book and all this talk about values has gotten me asking what is a primary Democratic value?  Here's what I came up with:

I am a Democrat because I value justice.  For me, that's our greatest shared value as Democrats and as citizens.

Our common Democratic ideals/values of opportunity, openness, inclusivity, compassion, protection, and responsibility all have an element of justice to them.

Both Republicans and Democrats value justice, but in the most reductive sense, I believe the Republicans are the party of freedom.

  • Republicans champion freedom.
  • Democrats fight for justice.

(more below)

AP Articles: More Democratic Voters and Bush Interview

Mon Oct 18, 2004 at 05:45:01 PM PDT

Two good articles on just hit Yahoo!'s AP wire service.

The first article has to do, again, with our (i.e., Dems) great registration efforts.

The Democrats appear to be gaining the upper hand in the battle to sign up new voters in the all-important swing states, an Associated Press analysis suggests.

The AP analysis of the most up-to-date figures from across the country found that, in every state where complete data is available, the Democrats have registered more new voters than Republicans. They have the edge in Arizona, Iowa, New Mexico, Nevada and New Hampshire.

Only in Florida is the story different. Registration tallies from more than half the counties show that the Republicans and the Democrats are virtually tied in the race to increase their share of voters in the state that decided the presidential election four years ago. In those counties, the Republicans have signed up just a few thousand more.

As for the two other big prizes among the swing states -- Pennsylvania and Ohio -- Pennsylvania's numbers are too scant to draw any conclusions, and Ohio does not register voters by party.

Also, there's unfiltered excerpts from the Bush AP interview aboard Air Force One.

My favorite quote:


Q: Do you think North Korea and Iran are more dangerous now than when you took office?

BUSH: No, I don't. I think that -- let me rephrase that. I think that the circumstances surrounding North Korea and surrounding Iran are more comprehensive.

Comprehensive?!?  Meaning what?  They have a more comprehensive nuclear program?  Great.

LATimes: Bush on the Edge

Mon Oct 18, 2004 at 08:50:29 AM PDT

The incomparable Ron Brownstein has a great article in the LATimes that explains why Bush is on the edge.

While the doomsayers watch CNN and the biased Gallup poll that shows Bush -- GASP! -- with an eight point lead, the real story is how Bush is only over 50% in two of four polls, and no incumbent wins if under 50% going into the election.


While most of America is watching the spread in the polls between President Bush and Sen. John F. Kerry, key strategists in both parties have their eyes on a different set of numbers: Bush's share of the vote and his job approval in the final surveys before election day.

Analysts watch the incumbent's numbers in the polls so closely because most voters who stay undecided until the very end of a presidential campaign traditionally break for the challenger. As a result, challengers often run ahead of their final poll results, while incumbents rarely exceed their last poll numbers.

"We know from the history of presidential elections that when a president is polling below 50% going into the election, he usually loses," said Alan I. Abramowitz, an Emory University political scientist. "That is true of incumbent office holders in general. The incumbent usually ends up getting the percentage that he is getting in the final polls -- that's it."

By that standard, the race today is teetering right on the knife's edge, though perhaps tilting slightly toward Bush after he regained the lead in five separate national polls released over the weekend. More importantly, for the first time since the debates, Bush in three of the latest surveys cracked the 50% level in support -- the best news GOP strategists have seen in weeks.

Surveys released Saturday by Newsweek and ABC/Washington Post put Bush's support at 50% among likely voters. On Sunday, Bush reached 52% among likely voters in a CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll, opening an 8-percentage-point advantage over Kerry.

But a survey released over the weekend by Time placed Bush at 48% -- as did the Newsweek result among registered voters. And the daily tracking poll by independent pollster John Zogby on Sunday put Bush at 46% with likely voters. Among registered voters, Bush got 49% in the new Gallup Poll.

Bush's approval rating, another key indicator, is still running just below 50% in most polls.
In the final weeks of the campaign, Democrats are basing their hopes less on the difference between Bush and Kerry than on those surveys showing the president below 50% in support.

"This is a very well-known incumbent where people have strong views," said Democratic pollster Stanley B. Greenberg, a Kerry advisor. "His number [in the last polls] I believe is his number [on election day]."

. . .


The article goes on to quote Matthew Dowd extensively and let him weasel his way out of this precarious situation, but the headline gives it all away:  Bush is on the edge.  Now, what will push him over?  

Iraq?  Flu vaccine shortages?  Privatizing Social Security?  The draft talk?

I'm betting on a combination of all of the above.

Flu = Terrorism = Another Bush Failure

Sun Oct 17, 2004 at 01:32:41 PM PDT

I'm picking up on a few themes mentioned in various other diaries, like this one mostly.  But I am so blown away by the new flu spot from the Kerry campaign, and I am equally thrilled at how local media have juxtaposed the shortage with Kerry's campaign stumping yesterday where he pointed to how this is directly attributable to the Bush administration.

I've skipped over the news programs this morning, but I heard Chris Matthews talking about how there is some discussion within the Kerry campaign about whether to focus solely on the economy for the next few weeks.  That would seem like a huge lost opportunity to me.  

It's not just about issues or about domestic vs. foreign policy but it has to be about the bigger picture:  George Bush is out of touch and fails us when we need a real president.

Why I think the Flu spot works is that it ties in so many of Bush's character flaws.  Like,

  • He doesn't heed warnings.  Like 9/11, he was warned about a problem, but did nothing.  Now, people will die.
  • He advocates outsourcing, rather than keep jobs here.  
  • He contradicts himself by now looking to Canada to help us with medical help.
  • He's out of touch by playing down the issue now.
  • Also, the catch phrase George Bush Mess invokes Iraq, which so many people have labeled a mess.

It's all connected.  It's "hard work," and George Bush isn't up to the task.

Oh, and the argument that the vaccine shortage is because of the 90's is absolute nonsense.  Remember, that's been the mantra for this administration:  Blame Clinton.  That's what they did for 9/11.  That's what they're trying to do for this.  If you hear that, hammer home that the administration was warned in 2001.  (See the John Kerry site for the citations.)


::